| ![]() |
|
![]() |
World Bank Partnership for Market Readiness: a critical introduction
20/01/2011 Carbon markets after Cancun: Carbon Capture and Storage in the Clean Development Mechanism 20/01/2011 A look into Cancún climate justice protests 20/01/2011 No REDD, A Reader 06/12/2010 Fast Forest Cash: How REDD+ will be market-based 03/12/2010 Enclosure of Forests and Peoples: REDD and the Inter-Oceanic Highway in Peru 10/11/2010 Nuclear power? It’s still no thanks 26/10/2010 SPACE FOR MOVEMENT? Reflections from Bolivia on climate justice, social movements and the state 12/08/2010 Carbon market “growth” is mainly fraudulent, World Bank report shows 20/07/2010 Creating new from the old: how the REDD+ Partnership plans to create a REDD market, plus! 20/07/2010 Industrial gases in CDM: fixing a hole? 20/07/2010 The UN Boys Club tasked with redefining climate finance 20/07/2010 MORE
Pueblos selváticos en la encrucijada
03/11/2011 Huhne leads battle in Europe against 'carbon fat cats' 22/06/2011 Europese lobby’s beletten reductie van broeikasgassen 21/06/2011 Industry lobby campaign to weaken EU climate policy revealed 20/06/2011 Cyber-scam artists disrupt emissions trading across EU 03/02/2010 Outsourcing commitments - review of carbon trading book 31/12/2009 EU carbon-trading scheme puts a price on pollution 23/12/2009 Copenhagen talks: “Lies, damn lies and emissions reductions pledges” 15/12/2009 What is cap and trade? 15/12/2009 "Protéger les riches" : le plan B de Copenhague 11/12/2009 Kuka hyötyy päästökaupasta? 10/12/2009 EU emissions trading an 'open door' for crime, Europol says 10/12/2009 MORE |
||||||||||||||














REDD+ rewards polluters with carbon credits, allowing them to elude their responsibility to reduce emissions at source. There are billions of dollars at stake and no real obligation to respect human or collective rights – the so-called “safeguards” mentioned in the negotiating text states that they should only be “promoted and supported” rather than being obligatory for governments. These sneaky words are absolutely inadequate to protect Indigenous and forest-dependent Peoples’ rights. REDD-type projects have already resulted in land grabs, jailings, servitude and threats to cultural survival. It is crucial to ask who is gaining from REDD+, who is making the decisions, where is the money coming from and who is pushing REDD+, and why. Below is an overview of some of the key players who are behind designing, implementing and profiting from REDD+.