| ![]() |
|
![]() |
Indigenous Peoples Set To Deliver Kari-Oca II Declaration To Rio+20 Leaders
21/06/2012 Carbon trading, REDD+ and the push for pricing forests 19/06/2012 Rio+20: Indigenous Peoples Denounce Green Economy And REDD+ As Privatization Of Nature 19/06/2012 Stop the Takeover of Nature by Financial Markets 19/06/2012 Open Letter about the Sustainable Energy for All initiative (SEFA) 19/06/2012 Castles in the Air: The Spanish State, public funds and the EU-ETS 05/06/2012 Alerta Verde 164: REDDes que atrapan todo 05/06/2012 Ephemera May 2012: The atmosphere business 05/06/2012 Wind Farms on “Our Copacabana”: The Wind Industry Experiment in Northeastern Brazil 21/05/2012 Nothing Neutral Here: Large-scale biomass subsidies in the UK and the role of the EU ETS 13/05/2012 No more evictions! Indigenous Peoples in Guatemala in defence of nature, lands and territories 20/04/2012 Winning the greenwashing race: BP sponsoring the 2012 Olympic games 16/04/2012 MORE
Flagship carbon scheme in jeopardy?
17/04/2013 Why are carbon markets failing? 13/04/2013 Time to scrap ETS in favour of effective climate measures 21/02/2013 EU urged to scrap carbon trading scheme 18/02/2013 EU carbon market boosts emissions, NGOs say 18/02/2013 Video: What’s wrong with the green economy?: Joanna Cabello of Carbon Trade Watch at Rio+20 12/07/2012 From Rio+20--GMO Trees and the Green Economy: Green Deserts for All? 11/07/2012 Cortina de humo: Fondos públicos del Estado español, falsas soluciones.. 05/06/2012 Pueblos selváticos en la encrucijada 03/11/2011 Huhne leads battle in Europe against 'carbon fat cats' 21/06/2011 Europese lobby’s beletten reductie van broeikasgassen 21/06/2011 Industry lobby campaign to weaken EU climate policy revealed 20/06/2011 MORE |
||||||||||||||














REDD+ rewards polluters with carbon credits, allowing them to elude their responsibility to reduce emissions at source. There are billions of dollars at stake and no real obligation to respect human or collective rights – the so-called “safeguards” mentioned in the negotiating text states that they should only be “promoted and supported” rather than being obligatory for governments. These sneaky words are absolutely inadequate to protect Indigenous and forest-dependent Peoples’ rights. REDD-type projects have already resulted in land grabs, jailings, servitude and threats to cultural survival. It is crucial to ask who is gaining from REDD+, who is making the decisions, where is the money coming from and who is pushing REDD+, and why. Below is an overview of some of the key players who are behind designing, implementing and profiting from REDD+.