by Robert Newman for the Guardian
Green Guide, August 2006
It’s one thing to live a low-impact personal life, but quite
another to do so at work. Most people’s biggest carbon emissions
come when they are at work, but these are the hardest to cap because
here we have less power.
So in my personal life it’s fairly simple. I never fly short-haul
(i.e. within Europe), don’t own a car, only buy stuff second-hand
- except underwear, get my electricty through Good Energy, try
never to use supermarkets but only local shops, I am a meat-eater
but try only to eat grass-fed, my website has a solar-powered web-host,
and through ceaseless carping I have converted a dozen very close,
but ecologically irresponsible friends into no friends at all.
But it is not so straightforward in the world of work.
It was my intention to make the world's first
ever carbon-neutral television programme when I recorded ‘Robert Newman’s
History Of Oil’ for More4 last year. ‘Will there be
travelogue?’ the executive producer had asked me.
'No,' I said, 'Apart from all the carbon
emissions, what's the point of sending me halfway round the world
to stand outside an oil-refinery in Houston just to deliver two
paragraphs to camera? Why not fax the script to the Mexican guy
who sells burgers outside the refinery gates and have him read
out the script while his mate holds a camcorder?’
And that's pretty much what we did. The plan
was to have a global network of carbon-neutral correspondents
or 'camcordistas'. And they didn’t even have to own or know someone who owned a
camcorder. There’s a website where you can click on CCTV
cameras by street corners and parking lots from Detriot to Dhaka.
Our carbon neutral correspondents could stand in front of one of
these either speaking their lines into a mobile phone, or holding
up a card on which they had copied out the next gag. The added
advantage of this idea is that unlike a flying-vistor, the local
might actually know something about the place, although this may
mean ceding authorial control here and there. Our carbon-neutral
Iraqi correspondent, for example, travelled by bus (duly noting
down that the trip was 14 kilometres and the bus a diesel one)
before delivering lines I had written about the strategic importance
of oil in 1918 while he stood in the British First World War Cemetery.
This done he then extemporized: ‘Of course, the real reason
Mr Newman does not want to come to Baghdad has nothing to do with
flying but is all because he is shitting in his pants.’
An expression of autonomy perhaps. But I
felt it detracted from my central thesis. And so his observation
did not make the final cut. Upon investigation I found that by
the time I watched the reel, the production company had already
sent him payment to Iraq , which seems to me to have been a little
previous given the show’s
budgetary pressures.
We e-mailed bits of script to Baghdad, Athens,
Wall Street, Caracas, the Niger Delta, but it so turned out we
didn’t use any of
our network of carbon-neutral correspondents in the final broadcast.
The idea didn’t work (but it will work next time) because
the global network of ‘camcordistas’ didn't have a
group identity, and so they footage they sent back looked like
an location-piece from most any news show or documentary. What
I should have done is posted each a costume that would always be
the same whoever the ‘camcordista’ and whatever the
continent. Or they should have all been catching a carrier pigeon
or sitting astride a zebra, or in some visual way integrated into
one show.
Filmed in the Hoxton Music Hall, the stand-up
part of ‘History
Of Oil’ was a chance to implement another carbon-neutral
strategy. Some of the stage-lighting was powered by two cyclists
in the style of Rinky Dink’s famous pedal-powered sound systems.
When the cyclists tired, members of the audience took over. For
the audience, this meant a sense of involvement in the show. For
me, watching them work up a sweat assuaged my resentment that they
had all got in for free. I even took a turn myself.
The drawback was that the whirring sound
of the fixed-wheel against the dynamo powering the micro-generator
was quite loud. Next time, with the simple expedient of a longer
cable, however, the cyclists could be in the next room and the
noise won’t be a problem.
( I'm the pioneer, I'm Johnny Appleseed. Learn from me, follow
me.)
The other carbon-tastic part of my work is
touring. Some artists like the Rolling Stones and KT Tunstall
have employed the Carbon Neutral Company (formerly Future Forests)
to make their tours and albums ‘carbon-neutral’. But this leaves me with many
doubts and many questions. How tough and Elliot Ness are the Carbon
Neutral Company around the Stones and the Tunstall? Do they swoop
unannounced? Do they shake them down? And who's doing the sums?
Who says it's carbon neutral? Where’s the sanctions, where’s
the fines? Does carbon neutral include all the merchandise, all
the stadium’s electricity, all the paper cups, all the people
driving cars to the gigs, all the millions of CDs and DVDs pressed
and freighted from Zhengzhou Province or Beleuchistan or Solihull
to all the brightly-burning high street megastores?
And besides, offset forests are very like
those which Amazonian U’wa Indians call 'Devil's Orchards':
single-species stands of trees with no understorey or biodiversity.
Not somewhere you'd want to go.
In 2004 I did a 26-city tour of the United States and Canada.
I travelled mostly by train, including one non-stop 36 hour train
ride from Minneapolis to Portland, Oregon. (Knowing I would have
to do that ride led to my giving up smoking before the US trip
- a hidden bonus). I was able to tour very cheaply because I had
an Amtrak one-month pass which let me go on any train for about
$400 all in. It made the journey more of a journey than a plane
trip is, and I actually met some people who weren't business executives.
Most of them members of the Rolling Stones, as it turned out.
‘Truly this is the Anthropocene era,’ Ronnie Wood
told me when our train pulled out of Kalamazoo, ‘for each
year humans burn about 1 million years’ worth of long-past
plant growth in the form of fossil fuels.'
'You're having a laugh', said Mick.
'Straight up,' said Ronnie.
But, climate-criminal that I am, I did fly
a couple of times rather than spend five hours overnight in a
Mid-West bus stop or take 3 days to get to New Orleans, although
luckily that doesn’t
seem to have had any effect on the place. Even so I decided not
to avail myself of British Airways’ hook-up with Climate
Care, which has created a scheme where the passenger pays money
to offset the flight’s carbon emissions. First of all, what
you are paying for is not to offset emissions but to offset the
danger of regulation and full-cost accounting being imposed on
BA. Secondly, there is not enough money in the world to offset
emissions from flying. Combine all the treasuries and gold reserves
and assets and gilt-edged security bonds of every country in the
world into one big lump sum and you are still not even close. How
much, for example, will it cost to put Bangladesh on stilts? What
day-rate were you thinking of paying workers to carry ice and snow
to the top of Kilimanjaro? How many laboratories with how many
tenured research fellows before we fine-tune the gamma-ray that's
going to zap the ice-crystal clouds in the upper troposphere caused
by vapour trails?
Fossil fuels have to stay in the ground. Carbon offset schemes
flatter the fallacy that we can continue pretty much as we are.
That we cannot is the central fact that I hope audiences will take
from my shows when I finally get to the venue.
Copyright © 1999 - 2006
Robert Newman
www.robnewman.com
|