| |
The World Bank’s new investment framework
to tackle climate change does nothing to address global warming, while
sacrificing the poorest on the altar of “business as usual,” activists
charged today. The World Bank and IMF staff approved the framework at their
spring meetings in Washington on Sunday.
The Bank was asked in July 2005 by the eight most industrialized countries
(the UK, US, Canada, Japan, France, Germany, Italy and Russia), or G8, to
develop the framework for climate stability. But research conducted by the
Institute for Policy Studies has found that the World Bank’s oil, gas and
coal projects financed just since 1992 will release over 43 billion tons of
CO2 over their lifetimes. The World Bank has yet to conduct a full
assessment of the climate impact of all of its lending. The Bank remains
heavily invested in fossil fuels-close to $30 billion worth since
1992. The Bank has also ignored the 2004 recommendation of its own“extractive industries review” to get out of all oil and coal investments
by 2008 on the grounds that the poorest are harmed by these investments.
Instead, the Bank strategy proposes the world embrace untested coal
technologies, nuclear power, and large hydropower as solutions to global
warming, while giving short shrift to renewable energy.
“This is a giant step backward from the G8’s Renewable Energy Task Force,
which in 2001 envisioned providing one billion people with renewable energy
by 2010,” said Daphne Wysham, a fellow with the Institute for Policy
Studies in Washington. (The Bush Administration killed that
initiative.) “The needs of the poorest who are least responsible for
climate change are once again being sacrificed in favor of an energy and
development model that primarily serves the wealthy."
“The Bank cannot bow under pressure from the carbon lobby to continue to
promote the status quo. This is no longer an academic exercise. The
effects of global warming are
already being experienced worldwide and it is the global poor who will bear
the brunt of the West's gluttonous lifestyle,” said Stephen Mills, director
of International Programs at the Sierra Club.
“Only a comprehensive shift to renewables and to strengthening
community-centric energy security programs can contribute to a reduction in
greenhouse gases,” said Smitu Kothari, Director or Intercultural Resources,
in New Delhi, India.
The World Bank draft investment framework claims the vast majority of
finance for clean energy will come from carbon trading, for which they are
one of the world’s largest brokers. Yet carbon trading is largely designed
to facilitate the continued exploitation of fossil fuels, which causes
global warming. “The Bank’s fossil fuel policy is nullifying the effects of
the ‘climate solution’ it itself is pretending to offer,” said Larry
Lohmann of the Corner House, a British research and advocacy organization.
For more information, contact:
Daphne Wysham, Institute for Policy Studies: 301-573-2468
Steve Mills, Sierra Club: 202-675-6691
Larry Lohmann, Corner House, UK: +44 (0) 1258 473795, 1258 821218
|
